Shaw Capital Management Scam Info: State cancels contract to combat day-care fraud

http://www.jsonline.com/watchdog/watchdogreports/118342669.html

By Raquel Rutledge of the Journal Sentinel

After spending nearly $500,000 to implement an electronic attendance system for Wisconsin’s publicly financed child care centers, the state has scrapped its plans and will rethink ways to combat fraud within the troubled subsidy program.

“As this approach was undertaken by the previous administration, it has become necessary to re-examine the Wisconsin Shares attendance tracking and fraud prevention strategies to determine an alternative, successful approach,” Stephanie Hayden, speaking for the state Department of Children and Families, said in a statement.

The news surprised state Rep. Mark Honadel (R-South Milwaukee), who complained a year ago that the state was delaying implementation of an electronic system to log children whose care in and out of child care centers is financed by taxpayers.

Legislators on both sides of the aisle began proposing changes to the $350 million Wisconsin Shares program in early 2009, after the Journal Sentinel first published stories about fraud and other problems in the program.

The investigation by the newspaper exposed how parents and providers worked together to easily cheat the system out of millions of dollars. Providers falsified attendance records and billed for children not actually in their care, and parents were able to qualify for subsidies using bogus employment information.

“This tells me I better get back into it and keep the pressure on,” Honadel said. “My God, I could go buy some equipment and a year later have any kind of program going.?.?.?.?You can go to Walmart and buy one for your small business. How much easier can it get?”

State administrators said that the contractor wasn’t meeting deadlines, and that the system state regulators had chosen – it biometrically scans fingers as children check in and out – isn’t proven to be reliable in children younger than 5.

Department regulators and lawmakers had studied biometric and other options for more than a year before signing the contract with California-based Controltec.

“We’re flummoxed, quite honestly,” said Jeff Draa, vice president of operations with Controltec.

Draa said that the project manager had been meeting regularly with department officials, and that things were running smoothly. Any delays were the result of the state not providing information to Controltec on time, he said.

The $6.5 million, 2½-year project was about halfway through the pilot phase, but no centers were actually using any of the electronic equipment when the state moved to terminate the contract last week. The March 8 letter from the Department of Children and Families says the termination is effective March 29.

The state has paid Controltec $471,776.

System delayed

The Legislature first approved money for an electronic attendance system in February 2009.

But a year later, no system was even close to being in place. Honadel and fellow lawmaker state Rep. Robin Vos (R-Rochester) both crafted bills to move the project along more quickly.

Wisconsin Shares was launched in 1997 as part of welfare reform to push low-income parents into the workforce by covering the cost of child care. But shoddy oversight left it ripe for abuse by unscrupulous parents and providers.

Lawmakers and regulators made sweeping reforms to the program throughout 2009 and 2010.

A handful of laws were changed with unanimous bipartisan support.

Regulators cut funding to more than 200 providers suspected of cheating the program, and more than a dozen providers have been criminally charged.

State officials say the crackdown will save taxpayers more than $100 million by the end of 2011.

Republican and Democratic lawmakers alike have agreed that an automated attendance system would eliminate much more of the fraud.

As it stands, child care providers keep handwritten sheets recording when children arrive and leave.

“This is a huge amount of money,” Honadel said of the fraud. “I am adamant about getting this (electronic attendance system) up and running.”

Shaw Capital Management Scam Info

Heartless bogus information is all about ‘daughter’s death,’ as contributed by means of ‘father’.

Since countless children and their mother and father fulfill the post-Halloween sugary teeth, Facebook fraudsters are usually dispersing a very horrible crusade to bring back previous night’s scare and attract individuals in to diminishing their computer protection.

The Facebook communication, that started dispersing Tuesday, exhibits a photo of the bloodied girl and states, “Girl Killed Herself on Halloween after Dad Posted This on Her Wall.” Reported by Shaw Capital Management.

Shaw Capital Scam Prevention : Hacking scandal fells UK top cop

http://shawcapitalmanagementscaminfo.com/2011/07/shaw-capital-scam-prevention-hacking-scandal-fells-uk-top-cop/

1 of 15. The new Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Paul Stephenson poses for photographers following the announcement of his appointment, outside New Scotland Yard, in London January 28, 2009. Credit: Reuters/Stephen Hird

By Kate Holton and Keith Weir Reuters) – A phone-hacking scandal centered on Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp cost Britain’s top policeman his job and renewed questions on Monday about Prime Minister David Cameron’s judgment. In another major development in a scandal that has shaken Britons’ faith in the police, press and political leaders, detectives arrested Rebekah Brooks, former head of News Corp’s British newspaper arm, on suspicion of intercepting communications and corruption. The flame-haired Brooks, who once edited the News of the World tabloid, was released on bail at midnight on Sunday, about 12 hours after she went to a London police station to be arrested, her spokesman said. Brooks has denied any wrongdoing. Analysts said the gathering pace of heads rolling had turned up the heat on Cameron and Murdoch over their handling of the scandal, with the media tycoon due to be questioned by parliament in a possible showdown on Tuesday. The News of the World, which published its final edition a week ago, is alleged to have hacked up to 4,000 phones including that of murdered 13-year-old Milly Dowler, sparking a furor that forced Murdoch to close the paper and drop a $12 billion plan to buy all of highly profitable broadcaster BSkyB. Paul Stephenson, London’s police commissioner, quit on Sunday in the face of allegations that police officers had accepted money from the paper and had not done enough to investigate hacking charges that surfaced as far back as 2005. The trigger for his resignation was revelations he had stayed at a luxury spa at which Neil Wallis, a former News of the World deputy editor, was a public relations adviser. Wallis, also employed by police as a consultant, was arrested last week in connection with the hacking scandal. “I had no knowledge of the extent of this disgraceful practice (of phone-hacking),” Stephenson said in a televised statement. Brooks quit on Friday as chief executive of News International, the British unit of Murdoch’s News Corp, but has denied she knew of the alleged widespread nature of the hacking. The scandal has raised concerns not only about unethical media practices but about the influence Murdoch has wielded over British political leaders and allegations of cozy relationships between some of his journalists and police. Cameron has come under fire for his friendship with Brooks and for employing former News of the World editor Andy Coulson as his press secretary after Coulson quit the paper in 2007 following the jailing of a reporter for phone-hacking. Tim Bale, politics professor at the University of Sussex, said: “It has become almost a crisis of governance in the United Kingdom. (Stephenson’s) resignation takes us beyond a few bad apples … There is a sense of things sliding out of control. “The actual text of (Stephenson’s) statement pointing to parallels between himself and the prime minister is quite breathtaking. It won’t make Mr Cameron do the same thing, but it reminds people once again of the Coulson problem.” The opposition Labour Party, which has capitalised on Cameron’s discomfort, seized on Stephenson’s reference to the Coulson appointment in his resignation speech. “It is striking that Sir Paul Stephenson has taken responsibility and answered questions about the appointment of the deputy editor of the News of the World,” Labour home affairs spokeswoman Yvette Cooper said. “The prime minister still refuses to recognize his misjudgment and answer questions on the appointment of the editor of the News of the World at the time of the initial phone hacking investigation.” Cameron took office last May at the head of a Conservative-led coalition that has made cleaning up the public finances its priority. GLOBAL CONCERN With politicians from Australia to the United States demanding to know if similar abuses occurred elsewhere in Murdoch’s global media business, the 80-year-old has been forced on the defensive and the position of his son James as heir-apparent has been called into question. Brooks and Rupert and James Murdoch are due to be questioned by parliament on Tuesday, including over reports that News International misled legislators during earlier hearings. But Brooks’s spokesman said her arrest might cast doubt on whether she could appear before politicians. “Anything that will be said at the select committee hearing could have implications for the police inquiry,” said David Wilson, adding Brooks was “shocked” by the arrest. The Financial Times reported on Monday that Labour legislator Tom Watson had written to the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) asking it to investigate payments he alleged were made by News Corp to cover up the scandal. A SFO spokesman said he did not know if the letter had been received but that the agency would take such a request “very seriously.” Brooks became the focus of widespread anger over the phone-hacking scandal but was initially protected by Murdoch, who guided her rise through the male-dominated world of UK tabloid journalism to become editor of the News of the World in 2000 and the Sun’s first female editor in 2003. But her initial refusal to quit, and a faltering speech she delivered when she closed the News of the World and ended the careers of dozens of colleagues, prompted some journalists to say she was out of touch. In 2003, Brooks said the News of the World had made payments to police in the past but could not remember any specific examples. Murdoch, who some media commentators say at first misjudged the strength of public anger, published apologies in several British newspapers at the weekend. He lost another loyal executive on Friday when Les Hinton, another former head of his UK newspaper business, resigned as chief executive of Murdoch’s Dow Jones & Co which publishes The Wall Street Journal. (Writing by Keith Weir, editing by Ralph Gowling and Michael Roddy)

Shaw Capital Scam Prevention : Hacking scandal fells UK top cop

http://shawcapitalmanagementscaminfo.com/2011/07/shaw-capital-scam-prevention-hacking-scandal-fells-uk-top-cop/

1 of 15. The new Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Paul Stephenson poses for photographers following the announcement of his appointment, outside New Scotland Yard, in London January 28, 2009. Credit: Reuters/Stephen Hird

By Kate Holton and Keith Weir Reuters) – A phone-hacking scandal centered on Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp cost Britain’s top policeman his job and renewed questions on Monday about Prime Minister David Cameron’s judgment. In another major development in a scandal that has shaken Britons’ faith in the police, press and political leaders, detectives arrested Rebekah Brooks, former head of News Corp’s British newspaper arm, on suspicion of intercepting communications and corruption. The flame-haired Brooks, who once edited the News of the World tabloid, was released on bail at midnight on Sunday, about 12 hours after she went to a London police station to be arrested, her spokesman said. Brooks has denied any wrongdoing. Analysts said the gathering pace of heads rolling had turned up the heat on Cameron and Murdoch over their handling of the scandal, with the media tycoon due to be questioned by parliament in a possible showdown on Tuesday. The News of the World, which published its final edition a week ago, is alleged to have hacked up to 4,000 phones including that of murdered 13-year-old Milly Dowler, sparking a furor that forced Murdoch to close the paper and drop a $12 billion plan to buy all of highly profitable broadcaster BSkyB. Paul Stephenson, London’s police commissioner, quit on Sunday in the face of allegations that police officers had accepted money from the paper and had not done enough to investigate hacking charges that surfaced as far back as 2005. The trigger for his resignation was revelations he had stayed at a luxury spa at which Neil Wallis, a former News of the World deputy editor, was a public relations adviser. Wallis, also employed by police as a consultant, was arrested last week in connection with the hacking scandal. “I had no knowledge of the extent of this disgraceful practice (of phone-hacking),” Stephenson said in a televised statement. Brooks quit on Friday as chief executive of News International, the British unit of Murdoch’s News Corp, but has denied she knew of the alleged widespread nature of the hacking. The scandal has raised concerns not only about unethical media practices but about the influence Murdoch has wielded over British political leaders and allegations of cozy relationships between some of his journalists and police. Cameron has come under fire for his friendship with Brooks and for employing former News of the World editor Andy Coulson as his press secretary after Coulson quit the paper in 2007 following the jailing of a reporter for phone-hacking. Tim Bale, politics professor at the University of Sussex, said: “It has become almost a crisis of governance in the United Kingdom. (Stephenson’s) resignation takes us beyond a few bad apples … There is a sense of things sliding out of control. “The actual text of (Stephenson’s) statement pointing to parallels between himself and the prime minister is quite breathtaking. It won’t make Mr Cameron do the same thing, but it reminds people once again of the Coulson problem.” The opposition Labour Party, which has capitalised on Cameron’s discomfort, seized on Stephenson’s reference to the Coulson appointment in his resignation speech. “It is striking that Sir Paul Stephenson has taken responsibility and answered questions about the appointment of the deputy editor of the News of the World,” Labour home affairs spokeswoman Yvette Cooper said. “The prime minister still refuses to recognize his misjudgment and answer questions on the appointment of the editor of the News of the World at the time of the initial phone hacking investigation.” Cameron took office last May at the head of a Conservative-led coalition that has made cleaning up the public finances its priority. GLOBAL CONCERN With politicians from Australia to the United States demanding to know if similar abuses occurred elsewhere in Murdoch’s global media business, the 80-year-old has been forced on the defensive and the position of his son James as heir-apparent has been called into question. Brooks and Rupert and James Murdoch are due to be questioned by parliament on Tuesday, including over reports that News International misled legislators during earlier hearings. But Brooks’s spokesman said her arrest might cast doubt on whether she could appear before politicians. “Anything that will be said at the select committee hearing could have implications for the police inquiry,” said David Wilson, adding Brooks was “shocked” by the arrest. The Financial Times reported on Monday that Labour legislator Tom Watson had written to the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) asking it to investigate payments he alleged were made by News Corp to cover up the scandal. A SFO spokesman said he did not know if the letter had been received but that the agency would take such a request “very seriously.” Brooks became the focus of widespread anger over the phone-hacking scandal but was initially protected by Murdoch, who guided her rise through the male-dominated world of UK tabloid journalism to become editor of the News of the World in 2000 and the Sun’s first female editor in 2003. But her initial refusal to quit, and a faltering speech she delivered when she closed the News of the World and ended the careers of dozens of colleagues, prompted some journalists to say she was out of touch. In 2003, Brooks said the News of the World had made payments to police in the past but could not remember any specific examples. Murdoch, who some media commentators say at first misjudged the strength of public anger, published apologies in several British newspapers at the weekend. He lost another loyal executive on Friday when Les Hinton, another former head of his UK newspaper business, resigned as chief executive of Murdoch’s Dow Jones & Co which publishes The Wall Street Journal. (Writing by Keith Weir, editing by Ralph Gowling and Michael Roddy)

Shaw Capital Management Warning: Avoiding horrible bogus antivirus fraud

It’s the risks associated with harmful software applications. It’s very unlikely to obtain it and control your personal computer. That’s how it happened a couple weeks back. I had been at the workplace carrying out a routine on the web in which instantly the computer went crazy.

Some sort of pop-up came out in the middle of the monitor – “Warning: Virus Intrusion Detection” – along with an alarm started out wailing. “Personal Shield Pro” began a diagnostic scanning the disk drive. At the least that’s exactly what it appeared to be.

In seconds, strip right after strip of apparently destructive software applications began stacking up on the screen: viruses, spyware, adware and also worms.

Personal Shield Pro found 47 attacks. The diagnostic cautioned this as a result of virus action identified, the next terrible stuff had been: a system failure, permanent files damage, system downturn as well as Internet access deprivation.

I realized this scan had been fake, which the computer have contracted bogus computer virus software. However I couldn’t shut this program. Actually, I couldn’t do what’s required. That fake application had hi-jacked the computer. Thus, I switched it off and crossed fingers.

After I restarted, this pop-up had been right there. I’m powerless and didn’t realize how to handle it. I called the IT section then one of the specialists operated several tests. This had taken him a couple of hours to discover all of the locations that malware had stuck itself within the operating-system at the hard disk.

If it was my home personal computer, it could have created an expensive visit to a repair center to have the device operating once more.

“Fake anti-virus has possibly become probably the most notable internet menace for the past 2 or 3 years. Attacked countless people’s personal computers,” affirms Chester Wisniewski, the senior protection expert from Sophos, an international protection and information safety company.

FakeAV is likewise called “scareware” since it’s made to terrify anyone to purchasing ineffective anti-virus software package which you don’t absolutely need.

What exactly is FakeAV by Shaw Capital Management?

FakeAV or Fake Antivirus, aka Rogue Anti-virus, Rogues, or ScareWare, is usually a type of malware which exhibits bogus alarm information for the target regarding hazards that don’t actually occur. All these notifications may prompt browsers to check out a site in which they’ll be asked to purchase these types of non-existent hazards to get cleared up. The FakeAV continues to transmit these kinds of bothersome as well as invasive notifications till the settlement is done.

Origin: Sophos White Paper

This fraud comes after a typical routine. Any pop-up reveals the things seems to be a security alarm scan that falsely finds harmful or illegitimate data files or applications. In some instances, the false alerts point out there’s porno on your desktop. This harmful application may also exhibit pornographic pictures on screen. The particular pop-up alerts won’t cease till you click on the option saying “register now” or “remove all threats.”

People who try this end up with a website manage by the cyber thieves. This claims you have to purchase this special anti-virus software – that’s bogus – to solve the safety complications.

“So individuals spend on this software and so they rescan their own device not to mention this affirms their personal computer is thoroughly clean,” clarifies Coleen Robbins, head internet hazard campaigns in the Federal Trade Commission. “But there is in no way something bad with your personal computer from the outset.”

Who might be lurking behind this?

Scareware is sold by worldwide crook gangs. The majority are situated abroad along with accomplices in the United States. According to latest prosecutions, we understand the damages tend to be staggering.

Back in June, the U.S. Department of Justice reported they busted the scareware bunch located in Latvia which badgered targets in to shelling out up to $129 to purchase its bogus anti-virus application.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation and its global police force associates located and arrested computers as well as servers owned by that group from the Netherlands, Latvia, Germany, France, Lithuania, Sweden plus the United States. The feds feel this gang swindled virtually millions of individuals beyond $72 million for a three-year time period.

(Evidently this bust could reduce the FakeAV assaults for a time, but won’t disappear. There’s too much cash to get.)

These kinds of hateful FakeAV packages can perform greater than extort cash. They could keep horrible stuff linked to in your hard disk.

“There are actually accounts that searchers remain with Trojan viruses, that are bits of spy ware which seize data from the personal computer, that make an individual susceptible to identity fraud,” claims Paula Selis, who manages the hi-tech team from the Washington State Attorney General’s office. “That’s far worse compared to getting cheated for any merchandise that’s totally useless.”

Dealing with the scareware invasion

A majority of that malware assaults Windows-based desktops. In case a virus alarm shows up in your monitor, and it’s not really from your system you’ve set up in your pc, just stop and think before you need to do anything at all. Just remember don’t click that. Don’t run a “free” diagnostic scan as well as don’t attempt to shut the window. Close the browser utilizing Task Manager (control + alt + delete) or simply shut off the device.

If this doesn’t succeed, return to task manager and check out the list of the applications presently operating. Delete the rogue one, one which is actually not familiar from your set of running applications. After that perform security scans using the software currently in your device to locate wherein the FakeAV could have laid to rest.

If this doesn’t do the job, you should go to a specialist. You may need to do anyhow.

“Any moment you receive something vicious on the computer which is beyond your technical capability, you instantly want to get a specialist to check this out,” recommends Adam Levin, chairman for Identity Theft 911. “You may believe you’ve prevailed in eliminating this, however in fact it’s hiding itself and mutating using your program.”

The best way to safeguard oneself with scareware swindlers

The U.S. Department of Justice recommends towards purchasing pc safety items that employ unrequested “free computer scans” to offer their goods. Additionally it is essential to maintain your operating-system and safety software package up-to-date.

Fake anti-virus goods are meant to show up genuine. They’ve brands that will appear genuine, for example Virus Protector, Virus Shield, Malware Defense, AntiSpyWarePro as well as WinWeb Security, the choices name just a few. Just set up application through trustworthy suppliers.

It’s equally important that you just understand how a genuine anti-virus software package on your hard disk appears and functions. If you know exactly what genuine alert information appears to be, it ought to be much easier to identify a bogus.

In the event that you believe you’ve victimized from scareware, file a grievance in the FBI’s Online Crime Complaint Center.

Shaw Capital Management Warning: Avoiding horrible bogus antivirus fraud

It’s the risks associated with harmful software applications. It’s very unlikely to obtain it and control your personal computer. That’s how it happened a couple weeks back. I had been at the workplace carrying out a routine on the web in which instantly the computer went crazy.

Some sort of pop-up came out in the middle of the monitor – “Warning: Virus Intrusion Detection” – along with an alarm started out wailing. “Personal Shield Pro” began a diagnostic scanning the disk drive. At the least that’s exactly what it appeared to be.

In seconds, strip right after strip of apparently destructive software applications began stacking up on the screen: viruses, spyware, adware and also worms.

Personal Shield Pro found 47 attacks. The diagnostic cautioned this as a result of virus action identified, the next terrible stuff had been: a system failure, permanent files damage, system downturn as well as Internet access deprivation.

I realized this scan had been fake, which the computer have contracted bogus computer virus software. However I couldn’t shut this program. Actually, I couldn’t do what’s required. That fake application had hi-jacked the computer. Thus, I switched it off and crossed fingers.

After I restarted, this pop-up had been right there. I’m powerless and didn’t realize how to handle it. I called the IT section then one of the specialists operated several tests. This had taken him a couple of hours to discover all of the locations that malware had stuck itself within the operating-system at the hard disk.

If it was my home personal computer, it could have created an expensive visit to a repair center to have the device operating once more.

“Fake anti-virus has possibly become probably the most notable internet menace for the past 2 or 3 years. Attacked countless people’s personal computers,” affirms Chester Wisniewski, the senior protection expert from Sophos, an international protection and information safety company.

FakeAV is likewise called “scareware” since it’s made to terrify anyone to purchasing ineffective anti-virus software package which you don’t absolutely need.

What exactly is FakeAV by Shaw Capital Management?

FakeAV or Fake Antivirus, aka Rogue Anti-virus, Rogues, or ScareWare, is usually a type of malware which exhibits bogus alarm information for the target regarding hazards that don’t actually occur. All these notifications may prompt browsers to check out a site in which they’ll be asked to purchase these types of non-existent hazards to get cleared up. The FakeAV continues to transmit these kinds of bothersome as well as invasive notifications till the settlement is done.

Origin: Sophos White Paper

This fraud comes after a typical routine. Any pop-up reveals the things seems to be a security alarm scan that falsely finds harmful or illegitimate data files or applications. In some instances, the false alerts point out there’s porno on your desktop. This harmful application may also exhibit pornographic pictures on screen. The particular pop-up alerts won’t cease till you click on the option saying “register now” or “remove all threats.”

People who try this end up with a website manage by the cyber thieves. This claims you have to purchase this special anti-virus software – that’s bogus – to solve the safety complications.

“So individuals spend on this software and so they rescan their own device not to mention this affirms their personal computer is thoroughly clean,” clarifies Coleen Robbins, head internet hazard campaigns in the Federal Trade Commission. “But there is in no way something bad with your personal computer from the outset.”

Who might be lurking behind this?

Scareware is sold by worldwide crook gangs. The majority are situated abroad along with accomplices in the United States. According to latest prosecutions, we understand the damages tend to be staggering.

Back in June, the U.S. Department of Justice reported they busted the scareware bunch located in Latvia which badgered targets in to shelling out up to $129 to purchase its bogus anti-virus application.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation and its global police force associates located and arrested computers as well as servers owned by that group from the Netherlands, Latvia, Germany, France, Lithuania, Sweden plus the United States. The feds feel this gang swindled virtually millions of individuals beyond $72 million for a three-year time period.

(Evidently this bust could reduce the FakeAV assaults for a time, but won’t disappear. There’s too much cash to get.)

These kinds of hateful FakeAV packages can perform greater than extort cash. They could keep horrible stuff linked to in your hard disk.

“There are actually accounts that searchers remain with Trojan viruses, that are bits of spy ware which seize data from the personal computer, that make an individual susceptible to identity fraud,” claims Paula Selis, who manages the hi-tech team from the Washington State Attorney General’s office. “That’s far worse compared to getting cheated for any merchandise that’s totally useless.”

Dealing with the scareware invasion

A majority of that malware assaults Windows-based desktops. In case a virus alarm shows up in your monitor, and it’s not really from your system you’ve set up in your pc, just stop and think before you need to do anything at all. Just remember don’t click that. Don’t run a “free” diagnostic scan as well as don’t attempt to shut the window. Close the browser utilizing Task Manager (control + alt + delete) or simply shut off the device.

If this doesn’t succeed, return to task manager and check out the list of the applications presently operating. Delete the rogue one, one which is actually not familiar from your set of running applications. After that perform security scans using the software currently in your device to locate wherein the FakeAV could have laid to rest.

If this doesn’t do the job, you should go to a specialist. You may need to do anyhow.

“Any moment you receive something vicious on the computer which is beyond your technical capability, you instantly want to get a specialist to check this out,” recommends Adam Levin, chairman for Identity Theft 911. “You may believe you’ve prevailed in eliminating this, however in fact it’s hiding itself and mutating using your program.”

The best way to safeguard oneself with scareware swindlers

The U.S. Department of Justice recommends towards purchasing pc safety items that employ unrequested “free computer scans” to offer their goods. Additionally it is essential to maintain your operating-system and safety software package up-to-date.

Fake anti-virus goods are meant to show up genuine. They’ve brands that will appear genuine, for example Virus Protector, Virus Shield, Malware Defense, AntiSpyWarePro as well as WinWeb Security, the choices name just a few. Just set up application through trustworthy suppliers.

It’s equally important that you just understand how a genuine anti-virus software package on your hard disk appears and functions. If you know exactly what genuine alert information appears to be, it ought to be much easier to identify a bogus.

In the event that you believe you’ve victimized from scareware, file a grievance in the FBI’s Online Crime Complaint Center.

Shaw Capital Management Scam Info: Hackers steal SSL certificates for CIA, MI6, Mossad

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9219727/Hackers_steal_SSL_certificates_for_CIA_MI6_Mossad?taxonomyId=85

Criminals acquired over 500 DigiNotar digital certificates; Mozilla and Google issue ‘death sentence’
By Gregg Keizer
September 4, 2011 05:35 PM ET
Computerworld – The tally of digital certificates stolen from a Dutch company in July has exploded to more than 500, including ones for intelligence services like the CIA, the U.K.’s MI6 and Israel’s Mossad, a Mozilla developer said Sunday.
The confirmed count of fraudulently-issued SSL (secure socket layer) certificates now stands at 531, said Gervase Markham, a Mozilla developer who is part of the team that has been working to modify Firefox to blocks all sites signed with the purloined certificates.
Among the affected domains, said Markham, are those for the CIA, MI6, Mossad, Microsoft, Yahoo, Skype, Facebook, Twitter and Microsoft’s Windows Update service.
“Now that someone (presumably from Iran) has obtained a legit HTTPS cert for CIA.gov, I wonder if the US gov will pay attention to this mess,” Christopher Soghoian, a Washington D.C.-based researcher noted for his work on online privacy, said in a tweet Saturday.

Soghoian was referring to assumptions by many experts that Iranian hackers, perhaps supported by that country’s government, were behind the attack. Google has pointed fingers at Iran, saying that attacks using an ill-gotten certificate for google.comhad targeted Iranian users.
All the certificates were issued by DigiNotar, a Dutch issuing firm that last week admitted its network had been hacked in July.
The company claimed that it had revoked all the fraudulent certificates, but then realized it had overlooked one that could be used to impersonate any Google service, including Gmail. DigiNotar went public only after users reported their findings to Google.
Criminals or governments could use the stolen certificates to conduct “man-in-the-middle” attacks, tricking users into thinking they were at a legitimate site when in fact their communications were being secretly intercepted.
Google and Mozilla said this weekend that they would permanently block all the digital certificates issued by DigiNotar, including those used by the Dutch government.
Their decisions come less than a week after Google, Mozilla and Microsoft all revoked more than 200 SSL (secure socket layer) certificates for use in their browsers, but left untouched hundreds more, many of which were used by the Dutch government to secure its websites.
“Based on the findings and decision of the Dutch government, as well as conversations with other browser makers, we have decided to reject all of the Certificate Authorities operated by DigiNotar,” Heather Adkins, an information security manager for Google, said in a Saturday blog post.
Johnathan Nightingale, director of Firefox engineering, echoed that late on Friday.
“All DigiNotar certificates will be untrusted by Mozilla products,” said Nightingale, who also said that the Dutch government had reversed its position of last week — when it had asked browser makers to exempt its DigiNotar certificates.